It starts with the controller programs, drawings, manuals and maintenance records you already have. Nothing working needs to be replaced.
Illustrative example: 41 seconds from the alarm to a supported answer, with the underlying evidence attached.
The controller program and fault register describe how the machine was designed to behave. They often contain the meaning behind an alarm that a dashboard can only repeat.
FUNCTION_BLOCK FB 15
TITLE = STATION 05 PRESS-FIT NEST 2
NETWORK
TITLE = Check force window
U "IO/5"; // measurement good
SPB OK1;
O "NIO/5"; // measurement bad
U( ;
O "MAXF1/5"; // force F1 max
) ;
SPB HI;
L -16; // FORCE TOO LOW
T "SR-5C";
HI: L -18; // force too high
WE: U "5/FEHL"; // station fault
R "5/FREIG"; // reset release
SM145 : BOOL ; // force-travel St.3 not ready
SM146 : BOOL ; // force-travel St.3 bad n-times
SM153 : BOOL ; // St.3 value outside range
SM196 : BOOL ; // cylinder fault, fixture
SM236 : BOOL ; // spring-break control error
The controller reported a force fault. Golain checks that fault against the rest of the line, rules out what is working and tells the shift lead what to inspect first.
M100 threw away too many parts this morning because the left-side gap camera at Station 9 (bellows fit) said the gap was too wide.
The press force was fine. The potting check was fine. The next machines were fine.
Golain does the evidence gathering and prepares the action. Your team checks the answer, makes the decision and records what actually worked.
Count the short stops that never make the shift report, group repeats together and connect each loss to the machine evidence behind it.
Compare cycle time, quality and throughput with the best performance this line has already demonstrated, not a nameplate rate it has never sustained.
Repeated alarms are grouped into one incident and checked against seven weeks of this station’s history.
The fault bit is matched to the machine’s own fault register and manuals: SM146, station 3.
The controller logic shows why the affected parts were routed to the reject bin.
A work order is raised with the evidence and inspection steps attached.
Repeated alarms are grouped into one incident instead of filling another alarm list.
A likely cause and next action arrive with the machine evidence behind them.
The result becomes a work order, inspection or operating change for the right person.
The verified outcome stays with the line, so the next shift does not start from zero.
Bring a recent incident and the evidence you have. We will show how the product connects it, explains it and turns it into a checkable next action.